Originally posted by Lantern of Gallifrey
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The J.R.R. Tolkien Thread
Collapse
X
-
-
Tolkein essentially wrote the treatments for two more trilogies. The Akallabeth is much more sketchy, but the story is there.
It would be as easy to make two trilogies by fleshing out those blueprints as it was to make a trilogy from The Lord of the Rings, which involved cutting stuff out, giving female characters more to do and adding some humor. And even easier than it was to make three movies out of The Hobbit, which was very much a stretch.
I've had my fill of the slo-mo battle scenes though. Those need a rest.
Comment
-
-
Re the battle scenes: In the LOTR books, when Frodo and Sam get separated from the others at the end of TFOTR and meet Gollum, the story divides into two alternating parts, and the part with Frodo, Sam and Gollum is much better than the other part. Peter Jackson used the battle scenes as Hamburger Helper to jazz up the other part, and it worked very well. But before The Hobbit had ended, you had seen too many battles. If any more movies are made, that needs to be kept to a minimum, and in fact I'd like to see the slo-mo technique abandoned entirely.Last edited by Trey Strain; 08-31-2015, 01:00 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Foghorn Lantern View PostRe the battle scenes: In the LOTR books, when Frodo and Same get separated from the others at the end of TFOTR and meet Gollum, the story divides into two alternating parts . . .
Comment
-
Good god Lurtz is even more of an ugly sumbitch on Blu-Ray
Also, Gandalf the Grey > Gandalf the WhiteLast edited by Booster Beetle; 09-01-2015, 03:36 AM.
Comment
-
I think it would be for the best to let the Middle Earth cinematic world end now. Hobbit and LOTR were the only things well loved enough to adapt anyway.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Daddy Dave Skywalker View PostI think it would be for the best to let the Middle Earth cinematic world end now. Hobbit and LOTR were the only things well loved enough to adapt anyway.
Comment
-
Yeah I would love to see at least some of those First and Second Age stories adapted. The way the Fall of Gondolin was written could be beautifully executed on film.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Foghorn Lantern View PostAh but The Silmarillion and The Akallabeth don't take place in Middle Earth. They take place in the western realm. No hobbits, no dwarves, no orcs, no trolls. I imagine no dragons either. Just elves and humans.Villain Draft 3: Fourth Place Winner
September 11, 2001; January 6, 2021; February 13, 2021
Comment
-
And it does take place in Middle-earth. Just because Beleriand was destroyed doesn't mean it wasn't Middle-earth. And I don't believe any humans ever went to the "western realm".
On another note here is a good video that tells a lot about the Shire. I however still can not, for the life of me, figure out how to post a freaking video.
https://youtu.be/9lvC2bNplsgLast edited by Lantern of Gallifrey; 09-01-2015, 09:06 PM.Time,Space and Will Power
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lantern of Gallifrey View PostAnd it does take place in Middle-earth. Just because Beleriand was destroyed doesn't mean it wasn't Middle-earth. And I don't believe any humans ever went to the "western realm".
Comment
Comment